IT Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

IT - Assignment Example The basic formats and practices can be duplicated however on the other hand to generalize and say IT no longer enables companies to create a competitive advantage in the marketplace was unsupported. Information technology is an evolving science its full potential still unknown. However with a better understanding of the innovative uses of the science companies have the potential of creating an advantage in the marketplace. The creation and determinant of the effective use of IT is contingent upon a myriad of factors, how a company implements the use of IT in its organizational structure and internal practices, how IT is used in a company’s external marketing campaigns, and whether the value of IT is understood by the leaders and managers as it relates to distinguishing sustainability. Corporations such as Wal-Mart, Hewlett-Packard, United Airlines and other recognizable firms provide the evidence that IT does enable companies to create a competitive advantage. Each of the companies listed has consistently used information technology to distinguish itself in the marketplace. Whereas other firms have implemented similar practices, the firms listed continue to set themselves apart by using IT in innovative and creative ways. An image of IT as a rigid format is erroneous to the contrary information technology presents unlimited possibilities. Leaders within an organization have the responsibility and duty to investigate the application and adaptability of IT practices for the maximum usage. By continuing to develop and implement IT strategies companies can position themselves as leaders within their respective industries. The lack of knowledge of the potential benefits of IT and its application within the organization as well as the benefits in the marketplace can make IT appear to be ineffective and a mundane costly endeavor (Parsons, 1984; Mata, Fuerst, & Bailey, 1995). Business leaders

RP2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

RP2 - Essay Example ed all of his living expenses for his time in Delaware, California and Michigan totaling 30 months, claiming all the expenses for food, rent and transportation were temporary living expenses while he was away from homes. Issues or tax questions: Abdul would like to claim a deduction for his temporary living expenses while he was away from home but IRS examined Abduls returns and challenged the deduction for temporary living expenses. Rationale: Temporary living expenses including travel expenses incurred during temporary work assignment or extended business trip that was intended to last for one year or less (J.k 88). Temporary living expense includes meals, local transportation and hotel accommodation or apartment rent for longer stays. Meals may be estimated using federal per diem rates. On tax return temporary living expenses are deducted as unreimbursed employee business expenses. Authority: IRS periodical 54, page 12, travel expenses are in Form 2106-EZ or Form 2106, allowable unreimbursed expenses are in the 2106-EZ Form or Form 2106 to Form 1040, Schedule A and are subject to a maximum based on 2% of calculated Gross

The withered arm Essay Example for Free

The withered arm Essay In Tony Kytes, Tony comes across as a bit of a player. This is because he asks all three women, all of which have had connections with Tony, to marry him, even though he is engaged to one of them; Milly Richards. Tonys attitude to marriage could be that its not really that important to the men of the 19th century, and that getting married is just to say that they are married. This is suggested when Tony is rejected by Hannah Jolliver and Unity Sallet, but Milly accepts again, just for the ability to say that he is married. However, the womens attitude to marriage was mainly that they had to get married for the social status. This is shown well through Millys acceptance to Tony. When Tony asks Milly, she replies with If you like, Tony illustrating how shes not very keen on marrying him after what just happened, but will anyway because she wants to be married. Unity Sallet comes across as an independent woman, which can be mirrored in todays times. She says take her leavings? Not I! , meaning that she doesnt want to marry someone that was rejected not one minute ago. Because she walks away from Tony, this can symbolise her independence because it shows how she doesnt always need a man there in her life. This links to nowadays because some women never marry in their whole lives, because they believe they dont need a man in it. In The Withered Arm, Farmer Lodges attitude to marriage is that marriage is for having children and carrying on the family name. Proof of this is after Gertrudes change from beauty queen to ugly duckling as Hardy describes Farmer Lodges realisation: she had brought him no child, which rendered it likely that he would be the last of a family who had occupied that valley for some two hundred years. This shows my point because it illustrates how he knows that hes it, that hes the end of the line for the Lodge name, and how he isnt very pleased that his wife hasnt given him a child. Farmer Lodge also bases marriage on appearance. This is implied through beauty was contorted and disfigured because it shows how he has fallen out of love with Gertrude ever since her arm had the curse bestowed upon it. Gertrudes attitude to marriage is very much the same of that to Millys in the Tony Kytes. This is because both Gertrude and Milly wanted to be married for the social status. From both characters, its subtle that they only want to be married for the status, but if you look close enough you can find it. Milly says if you want, Tony as though she only wants to marry him for the status and Gertrude says that lad stared at me!, also comes across as though she is happy with the attention she gets from her new marriage. Both stories have varying attitudes to marriage, but they link together sometimes. For example, Gertrude and Millys attitude to marriage is the same. Both stories attitudes link with todays attitudes to marriage because Unitys character doesnt really need a man so dont need to be married, and neither do plenty of woman in this time, and many men dont see marriage as a big deal, which is like Tonys attitude to marriage.

Postmodernism and Poststructuralism in Literature

Postmodernism and Poststructuralism in Literature In what ways do postmodernists and poststructuralists complicate our understanding of reality and its representation in literature and culture? Postmodernism is a shift of emphasis from content to form or style; a transformation from reality into images[1] which is what will be explored in the following essay and also the ways in which postmodernists and poststructuralists complicate reality. Focusing on how it is represented in culture. The theorists that will be focused on in regards to exploring this question are Derrida and Baudrillard with emphasis on the gulf war. Jacques Derrida is one of the major figures in the intellectual life of our time[2] Through his intervention texts are perceived in a different way, he discusses the conflicting relationship between an authors expressed intentions [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] and what the text actually describes.[3] Paying attention to ideas that are inconsistent with its overt statements.[4] Therefore, his theory of deconstruction brings to light [the] suppressed textual conflicts concerning what is ideal, primary or original[5] he focuses on the hierarchies between speech and writing; and nature and culture.[6] An important term when discussing Derrida is differance. Differance arises from his appropriation of Saussures concept of the sign[7] It is used in relation to the oppositions between presence and absence because differance is neither present nor absent but instead it is a kind of absence that generates the effect of presence.[8] The term is neither identity or difference but a kind of differentiation that produces the effect of identity and of difference between those identities.[9] Derrida invents this term to show the alternative understanding that refers to the passage of the infinite, endless differentiation[10] Differance means both to differ and to defer[11] Therefore, it is the unresolved deferral of the identity one might have ascribed to a particular term for example an entirely fixed meaning for the word dog never definitively arrives.[12] Derridas famous statement there is no outside of the text[13] does not mean that there is anything in the world but words on a page or books because Derrida redefined the term text. text means the indefinitely deferring movement of differentiation.[14] Rather than Derrida asking what is there, he interrogates the tangles in which we become entwined when we ask what there is.[15] Human beings tend to project something original which is represented or hypothesized by them, this is referred to as origins which is already enmeshed in language [16] The way we talk about origins, and what is secondary to them, produces the effect that there seems to be an origin.[17] Derrida always depicts origins textually and it is suggested that there may or may not be a beyond to the plays of language, the replies to his famous statement there is nothing outside of the text[18] are mostly in agreement that there is surely something outside of the text such as blood, rain, trees, and bodies, they believe that Derrida denies reality in favour of words[19] this response to his statement misunderstands what Derrida means when he refers to text. For him, the text means differance, spacing, relationality, differentiation, deferral, and delay.[20] By saying that there is nothing out of the text is stating that there is always relationality and differentiation but whatever is imagined as reality, it is argued that differentiation is critical.[21] The critics that object Derridas theories, they suggest the feeling of anger and emotion because emotion is not a text, some critics do defend Derrida but still fail to grasp what he means, for example, they state that it is impossible to describe anger without metaphors [and] linguistic meanings- we have always entered the world of language, [22] and that language constructs the reality in which we live in. Other critics argue that emotion is already differential[23] therefore, they believe that Derrida emphasises that we are always in the world of language, whether people refer to the rain or sun we never stepped out of language to touch the thing itself.[24] However, this explanation is a misunderstanding, according to Derrida a suggestion of rain in itself that I am, however, unable to experience except in the world of language and meaning.[25] This is a deconstructive way of talking because it projects an original world that people believe we cannot access, trapped in some prison of language[26] This raises the issue of a world that we cannot access, Catherine Belsey definition of the real, One can only think of language as a network, a net over the entirety of things, over the totality of the real[27] the real can be a place of traumatic events that should never be confronted, even in dreams[28] the real surrounds us it is a condition of human beings but it is something that is lost to us. constituted by culturally constructed images of reality.[29] A theorist that explores the loss of the real and the replacement of it is Baudrillard. His theory suggests thats simulation and simulacra replaces the real with a copy, no more mirror of being and appearances of the real[30] The real disappears because it is made up of miniaturized units, from matrices, memory banks, and command models.[31] Therefore, it can be reproduced multiple times, it is nothing more than operational. Thus, it is no longer enveloped by an imaginary [so] it is no longer real at all, it is hyperreal[32] The age of simulation begins with a liquidation of all referentials, by artificial resurrection in [a] system of signs.[33] Baudrillard suggests that this becomes a question of substituting signs of the real for the real itself[34] this process is to deter every real process by its operational double Baudrillard describes it as a perfect descriptive machine which provides all the signs of the real[35] therefore, the real is not needed to be reproduced ever again. He goes on to say that to simulate something is to feign to have what one hasnt [36]however, he suggests that to do this is not to simply feign because feigning always leaves reality intact [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] the difference us always clear, it is only masked;[37] but simulation on the other hand threatens the difference between what is true and what is false between the real and the imaginary because the simulator produces true symptoms[38] so simulation is a play of illusions and phantasms[39] Moreover, Baudrillards the gulf war did not take place suggests that the war that took place during January and February 1991 was a TV gulf war.[40] It is a perfect example of Baudrillards theory. a hyperreal scenario in which events lose their identity and signifiers fade into one[41] suggesting that the medias representation as purveyor of reality[42]what viewers saw on the TV was for the most part a clean war with lots of pictures of weaponry, including the amazing footage from the nose-cameras of smart bombs.[43] Baudrillard insists that technological simulacra neither displace nor der the reality of war[44] instead becoming an integral part of the operation. Technology allowed the boundaries between simulation and reality to become blurred[45] Baudrillard argues that under these conditions the virtual has overtaken the actual[46] and it functions to deter the real event and leaves only the simulacrum of war[47] however, as he points out this does not mean it is unreal in the sen se that it does not have real effects[48] therefore, the real vanishes into the virtual. The event of war had become obscene and insupportable[49] like every real event. Therefore, we are confronted with a virtual apocalypse, a hegemony[50] which is ultimately more dangerous than real apocalypse[51] in turn our virtual had definitely taken over the actual and we must be content with this extreme[52] because we are no longer in a logic of the passage from virtual to actual but in a hyperrealist logic of deterrence of the real by the virtual[53] Derrida misunderstands Baudrillard by stating that he finds it interesting that simulacra of images, television, the manipulation of information, reportage[à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] nullified the event[54] he agrees that something like this or something analogues happened[55] however, he quickly asserts his disagreement by suggesting that this should not make us forget-and the event unforgettable- that there were deaths[à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] that no logic of simulacrum can make us forget.[56] Baudrillard does not deny that there were any deaths in the war, Baudrillard is suggesting that the media controlled the way in which people viewed the war, how they were exposed to it and desensitised to it through its representation. Another example of simulation would be Existenz[57]. The film played with the idea that a digitally created simulation could invisibly and seamlessly replace the solid, messy analogy world of our everyday life[58] The film the Matrix[59] also gives an idea of a simulation where social control was nearly complete[60] therefore, by opposing the imagery with the real as two different narrative registers in the same film [à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦] Hollywood narrative, even in the most outlandish form, asserts all the more stridently its status as reality[61] Overall, Theorists such as Derrida and Baudrillard complicate our understanding by suggesting that what we know to be reality is in fact not what we think. Baudrillard believes that our reality is replaced by a simulation that we have to come to accept, this simulation is controlled by outlets such as the media Derrida suggests that language does not construct our reality like critics have previously stated but instead suggests that we project an origin of an original world which we cannot gain access to. Films mentioned above also show how we can live in a world of simulation instead of the real which we try to gain back but never achieve. Bibliography Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations, Julie, Rivkin, Michael, Ryan, Literary Theory: An Anthology, 2nd Edition (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004) Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, 1st Edition (Australia: Power Publications, 1991) Belsey, Catherine, Culture and The Real, 1st Edition (London: Routledge, 2005) Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, 1st Edition (UK: Granta Books, 2005) Evans, Mikhail, The Singular Politics of Derrida and Baudrillard, 1st Edition (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) Iwata, Hiroo, Dr. Strange Device Or; How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Media Art, The Journal Of The Institute Of Image Information And Television Engineers, 66 (2012), 219-222 Sarup, Madan, An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism, 2nd Edition (Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993) [1] Sarup, Madan, An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism, 2nd Edition (Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993) [2] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, 1st Edition (UK: Granta Books, 2005) p.xi [3] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 28 [4] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 28 [5] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 28 [6] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 29 [7] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 29 [8] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 29 [9] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 29 [10] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 31 [11] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 31 [12] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 31 [13] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 33 [14] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 33 [15] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 33 [16] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [17]Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [18] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [19] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [20] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [21] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 34 [22] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 35 [23] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 35 [24] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 35 [25] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 35 [26] Deutscher, Penelope, how to Read Derrida, p. 35 [27] Belsey, Catherine, Culture and The Real, 1st Edition (London: Routledge, 2005) p, 49 [28] Belsey, Catherine, Culture and The Real, p. 49 [29] Belsey, Catherine, Culture and The Real, p. 52-54 [30] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations, Julie, Rivkin, Michael, Ryan, Literary Theory: An Anthology, 2nd Edition (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004), pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [31] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp.365-337 (p. 366). [32] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [33] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [34] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [35] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [36] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [37] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 366). [38] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 367). [39] Baudrillard, Jean, Simulacra and Simulations. pp. 365-337 (p. 369). [40] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, 1st Edition (Australia: Power Publications, 1991) p.2 [41] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 2 [42] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 2 [43] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 3 [44] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 4 [45] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 4 [46] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 8 [47] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 8 [48] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 9 [49] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 9 [50] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 27 [51] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 27 [52] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 27 [53] Baudrillard, Jean, The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, p. 27 [54] Evans, Mikhail, The Singular Politics of Derrida and Baudrillard, 1st Edition (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 54-55 [55] Evans, Mihail, The Singular Politics of Derrida and Baudrillard, pp. 54-55 [56] Evans, Mihail, The Singular Politics of Derrida and Baudrillard, pp. 54-55 [57] David Cronenberg (dir.), Existenz (Alliance Atlantis Communications, 1999). Momentum Pictures, 1999. [58] Iwata, Hiroo, Dr. Strange Device Or; How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Media Art, The Journal Of The Institute Of Image Information And Television Engineers, 66 (2012), 219-222 [59] Wachowski Brothers (dir.), The Matrix (Warner Bros, 1999). Warner Home Video, 2007. [60] Iwata, Hiroo, Dr. Strange Device Or; How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Media Art. [61] Iwata, Hiroo, Dr. Strange Device Or; How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Media Art

Is the Shroud of Turin Authentic? Essay -- Religion, Jesus, Resurrecti

The Shroud of Turin is probably one of the most unusual, profound, studied artifacts in the world. The Shroud is a linen cloth that contains the image of what appears to be a crucified man. Many people have speculated that it is the burial cloth of Jesus, while others speculate that it is an artistic painting. Over the years many test and studies have been conducted to prove once and for all if the Shroud of Turin is authentic or fake. Let’s look at different perspectives and outcomes of the testing and you decide for yourself what you think to be true. One study believes that the Shroud could be evidence of the resurrection of Jesus. It is believed that the linen cloth contains areas that coincide with the wounds Jesus is said to have incurred according to the Bible during his crucifixion. The patterns have a distinctive resemblance to where each cut, bruise, and punishment inflicted upon Jesus would have left on his body. (Thomsen, Science News) Some scientists are even saying that the image on the cloth is from a scorch or possible burn of some kind. However, they seem to think it is from a form of projection, because no contact was actually made to the cloth. (Thomsen, Science News) How can that even be possible? Scientist can’t explain that reasoning, so if it can’t be explained does that mean it didn’t happen? To those who feel everything needs proof or reasoning, yes, but to those who trust in faith and certain religious belief, anything is possible. The earliest documentation we have tells us that the mystery began in 1389. A Bishop by the name of Pierre d’ Areis wrote a letter to the pope of that era accusing a knight by the name of Geoffray II of placing a cloth in the church claiming it to be the original cloth us... ...hentic or not. I don’t believe that it’s a painting of any kind, but I’m still not convinced that it was the burial cloth of Christ. I do believe there was a resurrection and that Jesus suffered at the hands of those who set out to crucify him. I believe he was tortured, beaten, scourged, nailed, and speared through the side. However, even with my belief I’m not truly convinced that there’s enough factual evidence to say that the Shroud was that used to wrap Jesus. I’m no scientist by any means of the word. There is a lot of evidence that proves it could be authentic, but there’s not enough to prove without a shadow of doubt in my own eyes that is the case. To be completely honest we may never know if the Shroud of Turin is authentic, but we’ve made it this far without knowing. Does it really make a difference one way or the other to know? To me the answer is no.

Bacchus:God of Wine :: essays research papers

Bacchus: God of Wine and Intoxication   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Much to many parents’ dismay, teenage drinking is a very common and infamous trend of the   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  times. Many teenagers illegally consume alcoholic beverages weekly. However, instead of linking this problem to the media or peer pressure, one may want to take a look back to the days of ancient Rome; more specifically the god Bacchus.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Bacchus, the God of Wine and intoxication, is known in Greek mythology as Dionysus, and is also known by other names such as Bakchos and Liber. His name means â€Å"twice born† or â€Å"child of the double door.† Bacchus was born to Zeus and Semele. Hera, wife of Zeus was jealous and tricked Semele into killing herself. Hermes, the messenger God, saved the unborn baby and sewed him up in Zeus’ thigh. After he was born, he sat at the right hand of Zeus. Apparently, his appearance was quite striking, though no specific descriptions were found of his actual looks. Bacchus is to whom we owe the thanks of inventing wine. He appears in numerous myths, almost always accompanied by Centaurs, Satyrs, and Maenads, or women who always seemed mad with joy.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Bacchus has his own festival aptly named Bacchanalia. This festival is celebrated on March 16 and 17. During Bacchanalia, orgies in honor of Bacchus were introduced in Rome around 20 0 BC. These infamous celebrations, notorious for their sexual and criminal character, got so out of hand that they were forbidden by the Roman Senate in 186 BC. His attributes in iconography include a drinking vessel, an ivy wreath, grape vines, and the thyrsos (a long fennel stalk topped with ivy leaves). Bacchus was also associated with resurrection because he is identified with Zagreus, son of Zeus and Persephone who was killed, dismembered, and eaten by the Titans. His heart was saved and he was reborn through Semele. One of the most famous myths involving Bacchus was when pirates captured him while he was standing on shore, for they thought he must be a prince by his stunning appearance. However, no chains that the pirates used to try to hold him worked, and only then did they realize that he was not a prince, but a God. Vines began to grow, wine began to flow, and Bacchus turned into a lion. The pirates jumped overboard and were turned into dolphins. As this, and many other stories suggest, Bacchus was often depicted as traveling throughout Greece, and often arriving at his destination from the east.

Persian Gulf War

The war was fought very fiercely for Just one year between 1990 and 1991. Its effects can soul be felt In today's society. The war had quite a large impact on history, particularly modern history. The outcome of the war arguably poisoned the minds of many people, crippling relationships between many groups; particularly between the West and the Middle East. Its whole entirety has left a major impact on the lives of many people and will continue to be looked at as a dark time for Middle Easterners and quite the opposite for Westerners.It is often argued that the war was ultimately a fight for oil. Several sources do present their arguments in favor of this statement, and are successful in establishing a case where this statement is true. His real motive was probably to take control of the wealth possessed by Kuwait (Lowe 2005, up. 253). Referring to Sad Hussein, the author has stated that Sad Hussein's primary motive for the war was to take control of Kuwaiti wealth. Their wealth was their OLL Industry; an Industry that the world relied on heavily, particularly for countries In the Middle East and beyond.Most people take the view that Hussein was short on finances following the Iran-Iraq neighboring countries; this had mostly gone to waste and Hussein would not pay it all back. Additionally, he believed that Kuwait was historically a part of Iraq. Had this been true, he would have already possessed Kuwait for a long time. Several reasons can be produced to support the claim. As Iraq was short on finances, they needed only to claim a nation that had a booming industry. They didn't need to take over a country that had larger powers, and both the superpowers at the time were neutral awards Iraq.These facts, along with the small size of Kuwait, were in due course the main characteristics for Hussein's motives. Moreover, it was the West who was also in strife when they realized what was at stake from the invasion of Kuwait. Lowe (2005, p. 253) argues that Iraq and th e USA were previously on neutral terms, as USA had helped Iraq in their war with Iran. In contrast to this, USA was threatened by the invasion, as it left Saudi Arabia incredibly vulnerable. Saudi Arabia at the time (and still to this day) have possessed the largest oil industry and production for a long mime.This fact left several Western nations vulnerable as well, as Iraq were very close to invading Saudi Arabia next and this threat was made very clear to the West. If Saudi Arabia were to be invaded, their oil industry would have been controlled by Iraq, and the supply to the West would have been cut. The overwhelming evidence suggests that the war was a fight for oil, and a fight to protect the wealth produced by the oil industry. A variety of viewpoints emerge from political conflict in Iraq, and other Middle Eastern nations.Most people take the view that the poor decisions by politics within Iraq, particularly on the part of Hussein, led to the downfall of the overall position and reputation of the Middle East post-war. ‘International politics of Middle East have long been volatile and unstable' (Cellophanes 1992, up. 10). Indeed, the politics within the Middle East have been volatile and unstable, and this has led to their national identity becoming weaker. There is evidence to support that there was conflict in national interests, religions and ethnic rivalries post World War Two.These inflicts have led the people to take sides within their own country, and to oppose neighboring countries who they should call their ‘brothers' or ‘sisters'. The balances of interests have been made harder and harder to achieve and maintain, stemming from the poor decisions made by the leaders of each nation. Therefore, Iraq's downfall arose from Hussein's overconfidence and greed for power, ambition, wealth and reputation. There are many reasons in favor for both sides of the issue about economic impacts for Iraq, as well as the U. S.The majority viewpo int is that Iraq was already suffering financially, and the war left them in an even worse position. The financial crisis in Iraq had reached breaking point by early 1990 and Sad Hussein was in a desperate position (Finland 2003, up. 14). It is established that his motive for the war was to gain money, but the war was decisively won by the opposing side, proceeding to the economic suffering of Iraq. Conversely, the U. S. Did not suffer nearly as much. Hancock (2006) argues ‘The Gulf War being the least expensive of all American wars resulted in a cost of only $26. 92 per American citizen'.Comparatively, citizens of U. S. Had suffered a low economic loss and this was loosely opposite to that of Iraqis and other Arab nations. It is unarguable that the Middle East suffered a lot more economically compared to U. S. A. According to many sources, the aftermath of the war has left its mark on many around the world, particularly Iraqis. Common far more in number, but left negativity w ith Iraq. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (2012) argues that Kuwait and Iraq suffered enormous property damage. This fact presents an argument to support that the huge property damage offered to Iraq applied to quite the rest of the Middle East.They had suffered huge casualties and property damage from the war, but this only created more anger for Iraq. Continued uneasiness and conflict between Iraq and coalition forces; primarily U. S. , led to Second Persian Gulf War (The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 2012). The second war was based off of Hussein's anger towards the West and ongoing conflict was inevitable from the outcome of the first war. For these reasons, it is established that the aftermath of the war had a major effect on Iraq and the Middle East.Even the most superficial investigation of the war produces the major effects of the war on the Middle East. The weight of public opinion is relied on the fact that most Middle Easterners suffered from the outcome of the w ar. Kettle (n. D. ) argues ‘Both Kuwait and Iraq†¦ Would have to face a period of turbulence and instability†¦ Both have had their political integrity and independence, as well as their economy and civilian structures, seriously undermined†¦ ‘. The quote conveniently provides the long term effects of the two nations, but has also affected the whole of the MiddleEast. It is argued that the Middle East has been seen by the West as a permanent battleground. The effects had on the Middle East have even been solely blamed on themselves. Authors Beverly Milton Edwards and Peter Handkerchief (2007, up. 97) collectively argue ‘one recurring theme in academic discourses is that contemporary observers, especially governmental ones, should have anticipated the invasion'. The outcome and aftermath have proved the adversity that the Middle Easterners have had to face, and the way they have responded in the past.As the same time, it is argued that this war has add ed to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Persian Gulf War led to overall instability within the Middle East, and it is because of this that there have been effects on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Conclusively, the war had a more of an impact on societies within the Middle East. In conclusion, the First Gulf War has led to ongoing conflict between the Middle East and the West in modern history. The war caused political, social and economic conflict between the nations involved in the war.